Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
ssrn; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.3727959

ABSTRACT

Background: Obesity as well as metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities are established, significant predictors of worse prognosis in overall COVID-19 population, but limited information are available on their specific roles in young adults (aged ≤ 50 years). The main objectives of the present Italian multi-center study were to describe clinical characteristics, and role of selected prognostic predictors, in particular obesity, in a large cohort of young hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Methods: Nine Pulmonology Units, across North and Centre of Italy, were involved in this retrospective study. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as radiological features were registered for all cases. Comorbidity were classified according to their known or potential association with COVID-19.Findings: A total of 263 subjects were included. The prevalence of obesity was 25.9%, mechanical ventilation (MV) was needed in 73 patients (27.7%), and 28 in-hospital deaths occurred (10.6%). Obesity and older age were the only significant predictors for MV in a full model adjusted for comorbidities and markers of severity. Pre-existing comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes and asthma, and increased D-dimer level were significantly associated with higher mortality risk, regardless of age, body mass index, and MV.Interpretation: Obesity in young adults is, per se, a strong, independent, predictor of a more complicated COVID-19, without, however, influencing in-hospital mortality. On the other hand, selected comorbidities, mainly hypertension, diabetes and asthma, significantly impact survival even in a young population, and prompt recognition of these conditions as well as a closer surveillance of this subgroup are highly recommended.Funding: none.Declaration of Interests: Prof. Bonifazi reports speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work; Dr. Harari reports personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from Actelion and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work.Ethics Approval Statement: Anonymized data of patients included in the study cohort were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records. The study protocol complies to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and it was notified and approved by the coordinator ethics committee (n. 2020131) and by each local ethics committee and the need for patient’s informed consent was waived.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Asthma , Obesity , Hypertension , COVID-19
2.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-42117.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: Multiple studies have been conducted to investigate Tocilizumab in patients with cOVID-19 pneumonitis. However, published reports show conflicting results, largely due to weak retrospective designs and heterogeneity in critical methodological issues. Methods: : This open-label trial was structured according to the Simon’s optimal two-stage design in order to clarify which patients could really benefit from anti-IL6 strategies and how a future randomized trial should be designed to provide reliable and unequivocal results. 46 patients received a single infusion of Tocilizumab. Inclusion criteria were: SARS-CoV2 infection diagnosed by rt-PCR, multifocal interstitial pneumonia, need of oxygen therapy (FiO2 50%) to maintain SO2 >93%, recent (within the last 24 hours) worsening of lung function. Clinical outcomes were established a priori to assess whether a patient responded to treatment. A low number of carefully chosen clinical and biological markers was measured in order to test their predictive values. Primary end point was early and sustained clinical response. Results: : Twenty-one (46%) patients fulfilled pre-defined response criteria. Lower levels of IL-6 at 24 hours after tocilizumab infusion (p=0.049) and higher baseline values of PaO2/FiO2 (p=0.008) predicted a favorable clinical response. Patients not improving at 72 hours were also non-responder at day 7. 11/25 of non-responder patients were intubated and 7 died. High levels of vWF were detected in all sera, with a tendency towards higher concentrations in the non-responder group. Conclusions: : Objective clinical response rate overcame the pre-defined threshold of 30%. Efficacy of tocilizumab to improve respiratory function in selected patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonitis warrants investigations in randomized trials. Trial registration: NCT 04315480


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Pneumonia , COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL